Rokinon 135mm F/2 Lens for ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY - YouTube Instead it means the style of rendering. This is perhaps because I'm more of a zoom guy (I have the trio of Canon f2.8 L zoom lenses, with coverage from 16mm to 200mm), and I didn't see that big a difference between my 70-200 f2.8 and my 135 f2except I could cover a lot more with my zoom than I could with a prime. Definetely the most sharpest lens which I have ever seen.
Lensrentals.com - Rent Lenses and Cameras from Canon, Nikon, Olympus lol, nice images, and i nearly bought this lens myself a few years ago. Also, we ought never question or diminish the joy of others. Available 03/21/23. Zeiss Jena or Oberkochen? Star parties or dark sky excursions are another great time to use a camera lens in place of the telescope. Were those taken with the Canon telephotos you spoke of, and the full spectrum modified camera and the clip in filter? That whole rig comes to about $1200, minus the mount. Nikon 300/4 ED IF, Sigma 50/2.8 DG Macro (not a telephoto, but good). It may be superfluous to add, but it can't do any harm, that in astrophotography all shutter control must be done with a wired or wireless electrical shutter release swith. So I sold it for nearly what I bought it for and chalked it up to a learning experience. A lot of us have been saying this for years. However, stepping outside to polar align a small star tracker and attach a DSLR and lens is quick and painless. However, all the reviews were made by nature and sports photographers, and I would like to find out more about their performance in astrophotography. Include the Carl Zeiss in your research though, it might be an interesting lens for you, even if it is a bit pricey for what you get. Focusing should be done on moderately bright stars using the 10x magnified Live View. You will see why. Begun in 1975, the Pentax K-mount legacy continues to this day. This lens is simply lighter, cheaper & faster (f/2.0 vs f/2.8). Now i have the f2.8 version, and while the resolution is better it s under no circumstance as good as the f/4 one. I hear great things about the Canon 200/2.8 L but do not have one. The 135 is lighter, but that's its only advantage. Lenses with extreme sharpness and bokeh tend to be heavy. Its a joy to work with every time. I used Canon's 135 f/2 for ten years. Super sharp and renders beautiful creamy bokeh. You can barely tell it's a pond.#3: Duck.Birds with bokeh are fine. If You can not, buy Canon EF 85/1.8, which delivers quite similar results. The APO showed no chromatic aberration at all with the addition of the Astronomik UV/IR cut clip filter (passing 380-680nm), but the telephoto lenses, even when stopped down, showed a tight bright red ring around all stars. To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. The 70-200L being a much more useful lens. 8MP is plenty for the usual 8x10 or 16x20 portrait print. " Samyang 135mm f2, 100mm f2.8, and asperical 16mm f2.8. In excellent condition, this lens retails for around $200. You're right, but a headshot is exactly where I want to see all those megapixels I bought put to use! A single, 90-second exposure using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. Most small refracting telescopes start in the 300 to 400 mm focal length range, and even these are classed as widefield telescopes. modest cost for "L" series, wonderful optics and fast speed, nitpicking, but not a circular aperature and no weather sealing. I have had a blast with a samyang, but a used 135mm f2.8 is VERY . Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. I do not like this. I got this lens because of portraiture. Juksu, your point is well taken. Also, the newer and much more expensive 200mm F4 SMC Pentax with the K mount is decisively inferior, showing small but annoying red chromatic aberration.
Samyang 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Telephoto Lens for Canon EF Digital SLR Cameras Yes, because it is not f/2. Large focus ring. +1 for the 135mm lens. I cant decide whether to clean it up in processing or let it be. Only con I can think of, and that may be a big one depending on how you plan to use the lens is the lack of weather sealing. The lens hood is removable (and reversible), which makes packing the Rokinon 135mm away into the included lens pouch possible. Canon's 700-200 zooms have IS and are weather sealed two features that the 135 f/2 lacks. The Heart and Soul Nebulae captured using a DSLR and the Rokinon 135mm lens. (purchased for $900), reviewed November 2nd, 2015 The moment I tried the Samyang 135mm F2 for the first time after purchasing it, I immediately felt that it was a very special lens. the EOS-clip filters are compatible with all EF lenses but not with the EF-s. Just not useful if you already have traditional focal lengths. Of the 150 images I considered fit to publish, only 4 were made with the 135. (For Nikon users there's the new 105mm too.). I shoot dozens of weddings every year but the 135mm stayed in my bag a majority of the time; I just didn't find myself needing to use it. Best lenses for astrophotography: 50, 85 and 135mm - DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging - Cloudy Nights Cloudy Nights Astrophotography and Sketching DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. To prevent damage to the lens finish, apply nylon acorn nuts (or cap nuts) to the tips of the retaining ring's three alignment screws. It requires the Contax-EOS adapter for attachment to the camera. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. KevinS, in my experience stopping down dramatically improves image quality in terms of chromatic aberration, coma and astigmatism.
Samyang 135mm F2 0 ED penoklatkowy obiektyw asferyczny tel A tiny bit of fringing, but that would only be noticed by pixel-peepers. As you can see, the magnification of the lens used will dictate the type of projects you shoot. I heard it's very sharp and well corrected. IS would also help outside with wind. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. here some information (sorry only in italian) http://www.astrovale-usm/index.html $581.00 for 7 days. The background blur is amazingly creamy with this lens. As I posted on the Petapixel variant of this article, cropping a 85/1.4 shot to a 135mm-equivalent FoV gives you approx. Pentax seems to have put more emphasis than others on keeping the resolution uniform all over the field. Now we have to read this kind of ignorant misinformation on DPR articles. The lens has 14 stops when turning the aperture. That means that it doesnt require a robust equatorial telescope mount as a larger, heavier telephoto lens would. The extremes are 2 and 22. Do you expect me to gawk? From my experience, the toughest test on a lense is its ability to function wide open. But in the rush to make hybrids why are aren't we giving video shooters the tools they need? Colour and contrast is great. If you want the best value possible for your money, and can survive without autofocus, buy the Samyang. Did anybody use this lens for DSLR astrophoto? Yes there's bokeh. Another example is the 100mm (or sometimes 90mm) F2.8 macro lens. The closest Ive been to the 135mm range is 105mm on my Canon 24-105 zoom. Same thing as people mistake "shallow DOF" to blurry background. The one and only 300mm lens I tested is the Zeiss Tele-Tessar 300mm F4. With weather sealing this would be a 10. I shoot it wide open 90% of the time. This is a very practical way to plan your next astrophotography project, and especially handy when using a wide field lens like the Rokinon 135mm F/2. Now - THAT's a lens everyone should have ;). I thought I had to sell my 100/F2.8 macro L but thanks for letting me know I can keep it. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. I need fast auto-focus, predictable focus lock and natural, vibrant color rendition. http://johncarnessali.com/camera-lens-tests/5109, After reading too many long, and arduous threads pertaining to the new Zeiss 135, I felt compelled to share my perspective on the wonderful Canon 135. Also, accurate guiding is essential. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. Valerio, Electronically Assisted Astronomy (No Post-Processing), Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, This is not recommended for shared computers, Back to DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, Buckeyestargazer 2022 in review and New Products. These are affordably available on eBay, and result in perfectly round star images, the way nature intended them to be. The Bokeh includes as well all that is in the focus, but mainly talked about how it comes visible in out of focus areas. Photos posted are pleasing but I'd be into seeing something new.
Amazon.com: Customer reviews: Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED UMC Telephoto Lens This is huge for me, as it allows me to be much more nimble with getting the right composition and angle. Got it! Image quality, weight and value for money. It could really use an update to its coatings. f2, very sharp, virtually without CAs, contrast, colour, lightwight, buildings. (Actually if I can live with the DoF I prefer it to my 85/1.2 too, as there is much less bonus colour.)
Widefield Astrophotography with the Samyang 135mm f/2 Lens The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion (ED) lens element to control chromatic aberration, and ultra multi-coatings (UMC) to both improve light transmission and reduce flare. (purchased for $650), reviewed June 6th, 2008 The aperture ring is marked with each f-stop, and you need to manually click through F/2 F/22 and watch the blades do their work. No telephoto lens I tested, nor my TSAPO65Q, was suitable for use with a DSLR "clear glass" modified to include deep red and IR. Several functions may not work. And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. Still - a great portrait lens when used at f/2.8 or f/4, with a creamy bokeh indeed. This lens has a long focus adjustment ring, with great tension. Maybe try a 400mm f/2.0 to see it that one's got enough blur. Over the last ten to fifteen years excellent apochromatic telescopes have become available for visual use and photography. Yes, it is about the same as 85mm f/1.4 blur factor is 60mm, while 135mm f/2 blur factor is 67mm. Great question Scott I think it depends on the image. In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. As soon as e.g. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get.". Neutral yet very nice colours. The flat lens hood is great for taking flat frames after a night of astrophotography. Finally, to prevent image shift during exposure, all telephoto lenses must be supported at two points: at the camera end, and at the far end with a large retaining ring. My only complaint about this lens is that the depth of the lens shade forces me to remove the shade in order to remove or replace the lens cap (my hands are fairly large). Its a trade-off, and one that seems to surface time and time again in this hobby. Rokinon lenses are made in Korea, and so is the Samyang variation. Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. But the Rokinon f/2 version fits into a different market. Or just get a zoom that is 24-200mm and you are covered. You will get perfectly round star images if you use an aperture stop in front of the lens made of a series of filter thread step-down rings. Just like the above samples, most are just bad. OM System's latest lens is a whopper of a macro, featuring optical stabilization, full weather sealing, up to 2x magnification and a whole lot more. I think youll find that this lens is behind some of the most amazing wide-field astrophotography images online! Why would I want a 135/2.0 lens when I have a 135/1.8? I've seen several listed but here are more to consider. Im so new to all of this so thank you for your insightful and educational posts. The interest of a f/1.4 is to be able to be perfect at f/2.8, while a f/1.8 or f/2 might need to be on f/4 to have the same sharpeness and overall IQ.They are not meant to be used wide open, except in rare moments.
How Did Clarence Burke Jr Die,
Chopped Judges Salary,
Schenectady Gazette Obituaries,
Beyour Walker Replacement Parts,
Love After Lockup Life Goes On,
Articles C